Recent American strike in the South American nation and the capture of its president have sparked worry regarding America's ambitions on Greenland. Supporters of the ex-president's political movement have allegedly focused on the resource-rich island in the wake of the events in the southern hemisphere.
Only a short time after the start of the Caracas campaign, a prominent right-wing commentator, who is the spouse of a senior presidential aide, shared a suggestive map. The graphic depicted Greenland draped with the American flag, with the single-word message: "SOON."
This overt suggestion to claim the resource-abundant land, which is a part of the NATO alliance, triggered swift and firm condemnation from Danish representatives.
"Denmark and the US are strong partners and should continue to work together as such. American security is also Greenland’s and Denmark’s security," declared the Copenhagen's envoy to the United States. "Our nation and the United States work together to ensure security in the Arctic."
The ambassador further pointed out that Denmark had substantially increased its defence spending this year, earmarking a substantial sum specifically for Northern and regional defence. "And yes, we expect complete respect for the sovereign borders of the Kingdom of Denmark," he emphasized.
The situation were additionally complicated by the recent naming of a Southern governor as a representative to Greenland. The governor had openly thanked the president, saying it was an "privilege" to work in a volunteer role to "make Greenland a part of the US."
After the military action in Venezuela, this envoy commended the president's actions, connecting it to the wider "war on drugs."
Ever since returning to office, the US president has consistently unnerved European allies with his expressed desire in Greenland. The territory is viewed as critically important for national security and future resource extraction. It already houses the most northerly US air base.
In a significant media interview, the leader declined to exclude the resorting to military force to acquire Greenland. This stance comes amid growing great-power rivalry in the Arctic. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he stated.
He described Greenland as having a "tiny amount of people, which we’ll look after, and we’ll cherish them... But we need that for global security."
In response to this persistent "rhetoric" of threats, Danish intelligence service took the unprecedented step last month of labelling the United States as a "security risk."
The prime ministers of both Greenland issued a joint and forceful rebuke: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You cannot take over other countries."
Public opinion in Greenland reveals a nuanced picture. While a vast majority of the territory's residents seek self-rule from Denmark, there is also little to no appetite to become part of the United States. The island has had the option to seek sovereignty for many years.
Some experts are now reconsidering the likelihood of such a move. One thinktank analyst focusing in defence admitted she had once discounted the sabre-rattling but was "currently not so sure."
"It wouldn't be that hard for the US to station a few hundred or a few thousand soldiers inside of Greenland, and it's unclear to me which power could do anything about it," she observed.
Evelyn Vance is a seasoned journalist specializing in UK policy and cultural trends, with over a decade of experience in media analysis.